Halcon, SBF and other "believers": My goal is to challenge your logic. It was a severe lack of logic somewhere in our families' history that got us involved in Watchtower. In my case, it all got started by my Sicilian immigrant ancestor who only had at most a 3rd or 4th grade education.
Once a person says they believe in God they have an obligation to think properly, logically... the way God thinks. If something is inconsistent in a line of reasoning, that should be a red flag that one or more of the components in a supposition is incorrect, or very likely to be so.
Atheists have no such moral imperative and so, you all have probably (rightly so) rejected the miracles that Atheists believe in:
1. Existence comes from non-existence
2. Order comes from Chaos
3. Life comes from non-life
4. Personal comes from the non-personal
5. Reason comes from non-reason
6. Morality comes from matter
That kind of reasoning is easy to reject. Only a very few have damaged enough minds that can believe in that idiocy. But, how can you continue to hold in high regard a man who in your estimation is a liar? Here are your choices:
1. Jesus was God and resurrected himself from the dead, while he was dead, just like he predicted. If you believe this, you should be able to explain how a dead person can do this. (You all know the answwer but something is preventing you from accepting it) Or,
2. Jesus wasn't God, but simply a good and wise teacher that falsely claimed that he would raise himself from the dead. This of course makes him a liar and certainly NOT a good and wise teacher.
This is one of the many problems with the unitarian view. It is not logical, not consistent and certain to be wrong.
I'm very curious; What is it exactly that prohibits all you unitarians from accepting the biblical definition (as opposed to the atheist definition) of man? Did you ever hold the biblical definition on the tripartite nature of man? Or, have you all always only accepted the atheist definition?
Edited to add: Vienne, I'd like to hear your comment on the last paragraph above.